'Monstruoso' - Finales alternativos

[~ΣDU~]

Pues ya sabéis, cuando salgan los créditos iniciales, nos tapamos los ojos para no ver el monstruoso título y todos tan contentos 

¿Creeis que este error tan garrafal en el título en castellano puede llegar a afectar a la recaudación en taquilla? Nosotros porque sabemos más o menos de qué va la historia pero yo creo que a cualquier espectador casual les puede dar la impresión de "poco serio". Si casi es más un título de parodia que de otra cosa....

Yo ya puse algo un 27 de Nov. sobre el tema de frenar a la peña que no tiene mucha idea de que va...

Sinceramente, esta mierda de tradcciones de titulos puede frenar a la gente a verla...

Le dices a tus colegas:

- ¡Oye vamos al cine chavales!
- ¿Y qué echan?
- 'Monstruoso', que que es la hostia, de JJ Abrams y todo, y el tráiler es tremendo... Os la recomiendo 100%, es como Godzilla.... y una mezcla de Rec xD
- ¿Como se llamaba perdón?
- Monstruoso
- Vayamos a ver otra...

 

[Schillinger]

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Y8pOm2TLI4&amp;rel" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/-Y8pOm2TLI4&amp;rel</a>

[rockcine13]

En este ultimo spot se puede notar el rostro del monstruo.Yo lo note viendo el mismo spot en Dailymotion ya que se ve mas nitido

<a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x40bgo" target="_blank">http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x40bgo</a>

Además encontre en internet ,
 los detalles QUE DIÓ JJ Abrams sobre el monstruo
Disfrutenlo

Building a Better Monster
The visual effects for “Cloverfield” were produced under the direction of visual effects supervisors Kevin Blank, Eric Leven of Tippett Studio and Michael Ellis of London-based Double Negative. Tippett created all the shots that include the monsters, while Double Negative was responsible for all of the other destruction and sequences which did not include the monster.

The concept for the monster (affectionately known simply as “Clover” in-house) is simple, says Abrams. “He’s a baby. He’s brand-new. He’s confused, disoriented and irritable. And he’s been down there in the water for thousands and thousands of years.”

And where is he from? “We don’t say – deliberately,” notes Goddard. “Our movie doesn’t have the scientist in the white lab coat who shows up and explains things like that. We don’t have that scene.”

Not only is the creature disoriented – he’s downright angry. “There are a bunch of smaller things – humans – that are annoying him and shooting at him like a swarm of bees,” observes Reeves. “None of these things are going to kill the monster, but they hurt it and it doesn’t understand. It’s this new environment that it finds frightening.”

For the monster’s design, Abrams engaged veteran creature designer Neville Page, who had just finished creating characters for James Cameron’s upcoming “Avatar” (and is currently working on Abrams’ “Star Trek”).

“So much has been done in so many different movies with large creatures that the trick was to find a way to create a unique character,” explains Abrams. The producer had first become familiar with Page’s work through the designer’s series of instructional DVDs for The Gnoman Workshop. “One of the things that struck me about Neville’s instructional videos was the way he approaches everything from a realistic point of view. He develops non-existing creatures, but can explain to you their physical makeup, musculature and skeletal structure.”

Adds producer Burk, “Neville was the first person we met with. And he’s amazing. He doesn’t just think about designing the creature, he thinks in terms of how it would walk, how it would breathe, what its skin would be like, how it lives – everything.”

Once Page’s designs were complete, it was up to Tippett Studio to implement and refine the monster for inclusion in the few – but crucial – shots in which he appears. “We did a test, where we inserted him into some background plate shot in downtown L.A.,” explains Leven. “We experimented with different looks, in terms of not only the creature itself, but how it would interact with the camera and with light.”

Another facet of the design was added at director Reeves’ suggestion. “I wanted him to have that sort of spooked feeling, the way, when a horse is spooked, you can see the white of its eyes along the bottom. And you see that when the military is firing on him, where he becomes completely agitated and confused.”

As part of a “post-birth ritual,” as Abrams describes it, the monster is seen early on scratching his back on a building (destroying it in the process), to remove a layer of parasites that are set loose to wreak their own havoc on the city.

“Drew and I were struggling with, ‘When you have a monster that size how do you keep the characters from seeming totally irrelevant?’” says Abrams. “How do you have any one-on-one struggle?” Explains Goddard, “Because he’s so big, we knew it was going to be difficult to have intimate sequences. It’s not like any of the characters could fight him or that anyone could even figure out a way to hurt him.”

And because of that, the idea of the parasites was born. “They’re these horrifying, dog-sized creatures that just scatter around the city and add to the nightmare of the evening,” Abrams says.

“The parasites have a voracious, rabid, bounding nature, but they also have a crab-like crawl,” Reeves explains. “They have the viciousness of a dog, but with the ability to climb walls and stick to things.”

In addition, the parasites also move more rapidly than their giant host counterpart. “Tippett Studio has a lot of expertise with these kinds of fast-moving creatures that can destroy people and rip them to shreds, which is always a lot of fun to work on,” says Leven. “They’re like little whirling dervishes that just destroy anything in their path. They’re totally deadly.”

[rockcine13]

Mejor les dejo el link del spot
http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x40bgo

notaron el rostro del monstruo?

[Schillinger]

Se ve algo, pero muy borroso. Prefiero no ver el bichaco

[Hiro]

El dia 1 me tienen de cabeza a verla

 

[jescri]

Gracias rockcine13 

Como dice el compañero se ve algo borroso pero bueno algo es algo 

[Hiro]

Primera y entusiasta Crítica de Ain’t It Cool:

    * la película es jodidamente brillante,
    * es al mismo tiempo una pieza de arte y un perfecto producto comercial,
    * es como Salvar al soldado Ryan (1998) pero sin nazis y con monstruo,
    * va a marcar época por reinventar por completo el cine de catástrofes y las monster movies

Esto no puede ser bueno

[Schillinger]

Demasiado buena la pintan ¿no?

[Hiro]

Demasiado buena la pintan ¿no?

Si, creo que se ha dejado llevar por alguna cosa. Aunque ojala sea todo lo que dice y tengamos una muy buena película de Monstruo

[Xema]

a ver si tiene razon la crítica, pero yo creo que si, parece to chula

[Jason]

Primera y entusiasta Crítica de Ain’t It Cool:

Interesante la entrevista a Belén Rueda en su web http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35262

De la peli, espero a verla mejor...

[rockcine13]

Aqui una critica de Cloverfield en video.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/bRK41KZlAow&amp;rel=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/bRK41KZlAow&amp;rel=1</a>



fuente:Cinencuentro
www.cinencuentro.com

[jescri]

Hola rockcine13, te arreglé el enlace para que se viera el vídeo directamente   

Desde Perú, grande Gianmarco   

[rockcine13]

Gracias por arreglar el enlace.
Saludos desde Perú